Legal Opinion

Berluchaux v. Employers Mutual of Wausau

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 1966No. 2015PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASEZ, Judge.

Plaintiff, Henry J. Berluchaux, Jr., appeals from a judgment maintaining an exception of no cause of action dismissing his suit against the defendants, H. B. “Buster” Hughes, Inc., and its insurer, Employers Mutual of Wausau, and Hess Oil & Chemical Company and its insurer, The Travelers Insurance Company.

The petition, insofar as we are concerned, alleges an intersectional collision in which plaintiff sustained various injuries, and further alleges that the vehicle belonging to the defendant, H. B. “Buster” Hughes, Inc., was at the time stolen and being driv*99en by the thief. In…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Castay v. Katz & Besthoff, Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Midkiff v. WatkinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Call v. HuffmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Town of Jackson v. Mounger MotorsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Fulco v. City Ice ServiceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tae Kim v. Budget Rent A Car Systems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Berluchaux v. Employers Mutual of WausauLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Tyndall v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1969
  4. South Texas Lloyds v. JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Kim v. Budget Rent a Car Systems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API