United States v. Miller
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL
BLUMENFELD, District Judge.
The defendant moves for a new trial on the ground that newly discovered evidence reveals that the government witness Michael Caron made a mistaken identification. At the trial, only obliquely did the defense question the fact that two separate loads of narcotics had been delivered to a man in Bridgeport. The dominant issue was whether that man was the defendant James Miller. His defenses were an alibi and mistaken identification. After hearing extensive evidence, the jury resolved both factual issues against him and found him guilty of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- John B. Janigan v. Frederick B. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. James MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- State v. BarryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Argyrou v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- United States v. PersicoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1972
- United States v. MillerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.