Ahrens-Cadillac Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Belongia
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtEich, J.
Aaron Belongia and the Belongia Law Firm, Ltd. (Belongia), appeal from a judgment denying their postverdict motions. The trial court held that because Belongia's motions were not filed within twenty days of the verdict, as required by sec. 805.16(1), Stats., the court lacked competency to exercise jurisdiction to decide them. The propriety of that ruling is the sole issue on appeal, and we resolve it against Belongia. We therefore affirm the judgment.
Ahrens sued Belongia for the value of repairs done to his automobile, and the jury found in Ahrens's favor. A few days later, on April 4, 1988,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Milwaukee County v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Maxey v. Redevelopment Authority of RacineCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- Moonlight v. BoyceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
- NCR Corp. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
- State Ex Rel. S.M.O. v. ResheskeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dorr v. Sacred Heart HospitalCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
- Schmidt v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- Northern Air Services, Inc. v. LinkWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- Gerczak v. Estate of GerczakCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- Fakler v. NathanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.