Legal Opinion

People v. Odom

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 13, 1966No. Gen. 64-77PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberspacher, J.

This is an appeal from a conviction of the offense of burglary and theft. After a jury verdict of guilty, sentence of 3 to 8 years was imposed. Defendant was represented by the Public Defender who waived all post-trial motions.

Appeal is taken on three principal grounds: First, that defendant was deprived of procedural due process in that the conviction was based in whole or in part on an involuntary confession which was placed in evidence. Second, that defendant was deprived of procedural due process in that his court-appointed counsel’s lack of competency and/or diligence prevented…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spano v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Blackburn v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. People v. MorrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  5. The People v. De SimoneIllinois Supreme Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. DegraffenreidMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. People v. MasonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. People v. BradleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. People v. FernandezAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. People v. NeeleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API