Legal Opinion

Mrozek v. Mrozek

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 1998No. COA97-315Published

1Opinion of the Court

496 S.E.2d 836 (1998)

Michele N. MROZEK (Gardner), Plaintiff,

v.

Edward MROZEK, Jr., Defendant.

No. COA97-315.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 17, 1998.

Law Offices of Mark E. Sullivan, P.A. by Mark E. Sullivan and Nancy L. Grace, Raleigh, for the plaintiff-appellee.

Robert T. Hedrick, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant.

EAGLES, Judge.

We first consider whether the trial court erred in finding that the marital debt owed to defendant's parents had no value as of the date of separation because it was not legally enforceable because of the running of the statute of limitations period with no…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Miller v. TaltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Lawing v. LawingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Allen v. AllenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Andrews v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API