Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Izzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 15, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant voluntarily left her employment as a checkout manager with a discount store without good cause. The record establishes that for the 10-year duration of her employment with the discount store, she had worked the same 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. shift. When…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of ChereshnevAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. In re the Claim of MarcheschiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re the Claim of MullenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. In re the Claim of PartlowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of DentonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In re the Claim of ErnoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API