Seabreeze Industries, Inc. v. Phily
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
KANNER, Acting Chief Judge.
The insurance carrier, asserting that the -fatal accident which befell Fernand M. Phily, deceased employee of Seabreeze Industries, Inc., did not arise out of and in the course of the employment, controverted the claim for dependency benefits brought ■pursuant to section 440.16, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., on behalf of the widow and three ■minor children of the deceased. By order Tendered December 10, 1958, the deputy •commissioner denied the dependency benefits ; and by order entered June 4, 1959, the full commission reversed this ruling, holding that the deputy had…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- US Casualty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Bountiful Brick Co. v. GilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Judson Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Industrial Commission v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Doctor's Business Service, Inc. v. ClarkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- El Sirocco Motor Inn, Inc. v. PrekopSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
- Henderson's Portion Pak v. CoteraSupreme Court of Florida · 1974