Legal Opinion
United States v. Samuel Aragbaye
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 13, 2000No. 99-50603PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
Samuel Aragbaye (“Appellant”) appeals the sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea to violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 287 (presenting false claims against the United States) and 371 (conspiring to defraud the United States). Appellant contends that the district court erred in relying on the sentencing guidelines for tax offenses rather than the guidelines for fraud in imposing his sentence. Appellant further contends that the district court erred in applying sentencing enhancements for being a tax preparer and for use of sophisticated means. We have…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. John L. St. CyrCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Rusel J. Jagim, United States of America v. Jay L. Depew, United States of America v. Jay L. Depew, United States of America v. Sylvester A. Ziebarth, Sylvester A. Ziebarth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. HopperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Kenneth P. Kontny and Joann L. KontnyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Lineten BelizaireCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. McENRYCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Gumesindo MontanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Steven WangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.