Legal Opinion

Hatton v. Rogers

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 15, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

CASE 105. — ACTION BY W. N. ROGEIRS AGAINST BEN H. HATTON ON A NOTEI FOR LESS THAN $50.00.— Appeal from Estill Circuit Court. Judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. —

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the court by

Judge Carroll

— Reversing.

Eogers sued Hatton in the Estill Circuit Court upon a note for less than $50. Some two months afterwards he filed an affidavit and obtained an attachment against the property of Hatton, which was levied upon the land owned by him. Afterwards a judgment by default was rendered for the amount of the debt, the attachment sustained, and an order entered directing a sale of the attached land. Thereupon Hat-ton came into court, and moved the court to vacate the judgment as void, upon the ground that he was not before the court when it was rendered.

Ther…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Louisville Woolen Mills v. TappCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  2. Hargis v. HargisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  3. Noe v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API