Legal Opinion

Wrm v. Hcv

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 9, 2007No. 2006-CA-0702Published

1Opinion of the Court

951 So.2d 172 (2007)

W.R.M.

v.

H.C.V and M.J.V.

No. 2006-CA-0702.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 9, 2007.

James O. Middleton, II, for Appellant.

Charles C. Foti, Jr., Attorney General, Steven W. Hale & Associates, Steven W. Hale, Lake Charles, Carla F. Chrisco, Terrell D. Fowler, Lake Charles, for Appellee.

2Per curiam

On July 7, 2003, W.R.M. filed a "Petition to Establish Filiation" against H.C.V. and M.J.V., alleging that he is the biological father of A.M.V as a result of an adulterous affair between H.C.V. and W.R.M. In response, H.C.V. and M.J.V. filed exceptions of no cause of action, no right of action,…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Johnson; Concurrence · Traylor; Concurrence · Weimer.

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Michael H. v. Gerald D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Joseph v. Hospital Service District No. 2 of the Parish of St. MarySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API