Legal Opinion
Doe v. Alsaud
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 13, 2016No. 13 Civ. 571PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Sweet, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Jane Doe (“Plaintiff’ or “Doe”) has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 as to pro se defendant Mustapha Ouanes’s (“Defendant” or “Ouanes”) liability. Based on the conclusions set forth below, Plaintiffs motion is granted.
I. Prior Proceedings
Plaintiff filed the complaint to commence the instant action on January 25, 2013. Plaintiff alleged Ouanes, as an employee of HRH Prince Abdulaziz Bin Fahd Alsaud (“Prince Abdulaziz Bin Fahd”) and Hariri Interests doing business as Saudi Oger LTD (“Saudi Oger”),…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jose GOENAGA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARCH OF DIMES BIRTH DEFECTS FOUNDATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Broughton v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Howell v. New York Post Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Daniel Atkinson v. City of Newburgh, et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Dixon v. ReidDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Doe v. HyassatDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Gavel v. Wow Payments LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Giuffre v. Prince AndrewDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.