Legal Opinion

Davis v. Stone

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 19, 1953No. 34765PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

1. In a processioning proceeding, it is necessary for the return of the processioners, together with the plat and certificate of the surveyor, to show affirmatively that a line has been run and marked anew by the processioners, and to locate the land, the boundaries of which are so re-established; otherwise, the proceedings will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Rawis v. Nowell, 133 Ga. 874 (67 S. E. 187); Amos v. Parker, 88 Ga. 754 (16 S. E. 200).

2. Where a protest is filed to the return of the processioners, and the issue tried in the superior court, the protest must specify with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Amos v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  2. Howland v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Rawls v. NowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Edenfield v. LanierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moore v. Georgia Power CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Morgan v. LivseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API