Davis v. Stone
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
1. In a processioning proceeding, it is necessary for the return of the processioners, together with the plat and certificate of the surveyor, to show affirmatively that a line has been run and marked anew by the processioners, and to locate the land, the boundaries of which are so re-established; otherwise, the proceedings will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Rawis v. Nowell, 133 Ga. 874 (67 S. E. 187); Amos v. Parker, 88 Ga. 754 (16 S. E. 200).
2. Where a protest is filed to the return of the processioners, and the issue tried in the superior court, the protest must specify with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Amos v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Howland v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Rawls v. NowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Edenfield v. LanierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
3Cited by2 opinions
- Moore v. Georgia Power CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Morgan v. LivseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970