Legal Opinion
Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Mohamed A.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 9, 2006No. Nos. B187208, B187209PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KRIEGLER, J.
After a juvenile court referee declared two children dependents of the court, a juvenile court judge denied their father’s applications for rehearing by signing and dating a denial order on the face of each application on the 20th day after the applications were filed. As to one child, no minute order was prepared by the clerk to document the denial of the rehearing application; as to the second child, a minute order was prepared but was dated more than 20 days after the rehearing application was filed. In the published portion of this opinion, we hold that the juvenile…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. RicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Kane v. HurleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Desherow v. RhodesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Flores v. Southcoast Auto. Liquidators, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- N.S. v. D.M., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- P. v. Vickers CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2013