Legal Opinion
In re M.O.R.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 17, 2004No. 03-FS-980PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
This appeal calls upon us to delineate the scope of the trial court’s authority vis a vis the Director of Social Services in the termination of certain juvenile proceedings. Appellant, M.O.R., challenges an order of the trial court denying his motion to terminate proceedings notwithstanding that the Director of Social Services decided not to seek an extension of his probationary period, and requiring him to continue to abide by the conditions of his probation. We hold that the trial court exceeded its authority in denying M.O.R.’s motion to terminate his probation.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. GoldenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Smith v. PollinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Varela v. Hi-Lo Powered Stirrups, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Kleinbart v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- District of Columbia v. 17M Associates, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- District of Columbia v. FitzgeraldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- District of Columbia v. Fraternal Order of Police Metropolitan Police Labor CommitteeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- A.C. v. N.W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- A.C. v. N.W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.