Legal Opinion

Deimel v. Obert

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 24, 1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jasper county; the Hon. William C. Jones, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtPillsbury, J.

This action was brought by the appellee to recover damages resulting from the act of the appellant in removing his portion of a division fence between the lands of the parties. After the removal of the fence the crops of the appellee were damaged by domestic animals coming upon his premises, until by rebuilding the division fence he protected his crops. He claimed to recover for crops destroyed and also for rebuilding the fence, and on the trial below was allowed both items. The appellant had a notice prepared, informing the appellee that at the expiration of a year he would remove such…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moore v. Hope Natural Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Incorporated Town of Casey v. HogueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Tooele Meat & Storage Co. v. MorseUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  4. People v. AdamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  5. American Radiator Company v. HampsonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API