United States v. Lillie
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
CEDARBURG, Chief Judge:
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 69, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 869, the record of proceedings in this case was forwarded by the Judge Advocate General for review by this Court. Attention was invited to the following issue:
I
WAS THE ARTICLE 32 PRETRIAL INVESTIGATION PROPERLY CONVENED (UNITED STATES V. DONALDSON, 23 U.S.C.M.A. 293, 49 C.M.R. 542 (1975))?
Appellate defense counsel in his brief also raised a second issue:
II
THERE IS NO PROOF IN THE RECORD THAT A COPY OF THE STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE’S POST-TRIAL REVIEW WAS SERVED ON DEFENSE COUNSEL;…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. MickelUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. HillUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. TaltyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. KloeseU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987