Legal Opinion

Shapiro v. Friedman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 2, 1945PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brogan, Chief Justice.

The question presented by this appeal calls for construction of B. S. 2:24-7 (a section of our statute of limitations) under which, in the computation of time from accrual of an action until it is barred by the passing of time, allowance is made in appropriate instances for such periods as a debtor shall-be absent from the state. The statute reads as follows:

“2:24-7. If any person against whom there is or may be a cause of action specified in sections 2:24-l, 2:24-2, 2:24-3. 2 :24-5, 2 :24^6, 2:24-16 or 2 :24-17 of this title is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Meyers v. Credit LyonnaisNew York Court of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Blackmon v. GovernDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1956
  2. Merchants & Planters National Bank of Sherman v. AppleyardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Holzsager v. WarburtonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1978
  4. Marsh v. DavisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  5. Zelson v. ThomfordeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API