Legal Opinion
Holad v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 8, 1967PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBenjamin Brenner, J.
In April, 1964 petitioner brought on a motion for leave to sue MVAIC for injuries which the infant herein had allegedly received in 1963 when a “hit and run ” vehicle had struck another vehicle which then mounted the sidewalk and struck the infant. By order dated May 25, 1964 that application was denied, for at that time decisional law interpreting section 617 of the Insurance Law required direct physical contact between the “ hit and run ” ear and the injured person or the automobile in which the injured person was a passenger; this is to say, that it was then a condition precedent to. a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of Kahn (National City Bank)New York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. 9 Avenue-31 Street Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Bardons & Oliver, Inc. v. Amtorg Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Bellavia v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961
- New York Central Railroad v. Beacon Milling Co.New York Supreme Court · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Foley v. RocheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- In re the Arbitration between SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- American Trading Co. v. FishNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- Tonkonogy v. SeidenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Rubin v. DondyshCivil Court of the City of New York · 1990