Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Birkey

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided May 30, 2019No. 1:14-cv-01108Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION JOEL JACKSON, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:14-cv-01108-MMM v. RICHARD BIRKEY, et al., Defendants. ORDER Now before the Court are the Plaintiff, Joel Jackson’s, Amended Petition for Attorney Fees and Costs (D. 156),1 the Defendants’, Richard Birkey, Richard Mautino, and Curtis Wilkey, Response (D. 173), and the Plaintiff’s Reply (D. 176). The parties also filed an Agreed Response regarding the calculated rate of attorney fees. (D. 177). For the reasons set forth below, the Plaintiff’s Amended Petition is GRANTED in part…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Kenneth Spegon v. The Catholic Bishop of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  5. Alex F. Beamon v. Marshall & Ilsley Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API