Legal Opinion
Byrd v. Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Ass'n
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided April 14, 2017No. Case No. 3:16-cv-02738PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Judge Sharp
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff1 Tennessee Fine Wines and Spirits, LLC’s (d/b/a Total Wine Spirits Beer & More) (“Tennessee Fine Wines”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, (Docket No. 55), to which Plaintiff Clayton Byrd (“Byrd”) and Defendant Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Association (“Association”) have filed Responses in Opposition, (Docket Nos. 73, 90), and Plaintiff Tennessee Fine Wines has replied, (Docket Nos. 76, 95). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant Plaintiff Tennessee Fine Wines’ Motion.
BACKGROUND
The relevant facts are…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- New Energy Co. of Indiana v. LimbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Assn. v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Clayton Byrd v. Tenn. Wine & Spirits Retailers Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Alcoholic BeveragesConstitutional Law – Whether Non-Durational Residency Requirements for Alcoholic Beverages Licensees in Harford County are Permissible Under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, Maryland Attorney General Reports2021
- Clayton Byrd v. Tenn. Wine & Spirits Retailers Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Maryland Attorney General Opinion 106OAG082, Maryland Attorney General Reports2021