Harold Haggerty v. Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. Merom Generating Station
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PYLE, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Harold Haggerty (“Haggerty”) appeals the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. (“Hoosier Energy”).
We affirm.
ISSUE
Whether the trial court erred by granting summary judgment to Hoosier Energy on Haggerty’s negligence claim.
FACTS
Hoosier Energy owns and operates an electric generation facility known as the Merom Generating Station (“Station”), located in Sullivan County, Indiana. Hoosier Energy entered into a contract with C & K Industrial Services (“C & K”), Hag-gerty’s employer. Hoosier Energy…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Williams v. TharpIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Rhodes v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Bagley v. Insight Communications Co., LPIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Shell Oil Co. v. MeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Merrill v. Knauf Fiber Glass GmbHIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tiffance Fields v. Constance M. GawIndiana Court of Appeals · 2023