Legal Opinion
Giant Group, Ltd. v. Sands
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 16, 2001No. 00 CIV. 7578(RWS)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Arthur Anderson LLP (“Anderson”), Friedman Alpren & Green LLP (“Friedman”) and Glenn Sands (“Sands”) have each filed motions to dismiss this securities fraud action pursuant to Rules 9(b) and 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff Giant Group, Ltd. (“Giant”) opposes the motions. For the reasons set forth below, the motions will be granted.
The Parties
Giant is a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware, with its principal place of business in Beverly Hills, California. As a result of the transaction at issue in this case, Giant…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Rothman v. GregorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Kramer v. Time Warner Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Sterling Foster & Co., Inc., Securities Lit.District Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- De La Fuente v. DCI Telecommunications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Carruthers v. FlaumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- In Re USEC Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Benak v. Alliance Capital Management L.P.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.