Legal Opinion

Skeffington v. Rowland

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 13, 1936No. 25189PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

1. In a suit on a promissory note secured by a deed to land, it is not permissible for the maker to set up by way of plea and answer that by executing these two instruments together the payee agreed to look solely to the land for repayment of the debt due, and the maker of the note was not to be under any personal obligation, and no personal judgment could be procured against him, but only a judgment in rem against the property eould be had, no matter what value might be placed on the land at the time of the maturity of the debt. This would be to add to, vary, and contradict the plain terms…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hirsch v. OliverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. Byrd & Co. v. Marietta Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Ramsey-Fender Motor Co. v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  4. Pulliam v. Merchants & Miners State BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. Watkins v. WoodberyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. . KirkpatrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Auerbach v. First National Bank of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API