Branch v. Bishop
Supreme Court of Georgia
Action for damages. Before Judge Brand. Oconee superior court. July 19, 1909.
1Opinion of the Court
.Atkinson, J.
1. The grounds of the motion for new trial, based on rulings of the court as to the admissibility of evidence, so far as they were approved by the judge, and the ground's relative to the charge to the jury, so far as approved by the judge, do not disclose any such errólas to require the grant of a new trial.
*111September 21, 1910. Action for damages. Before Judge Brand. Oconee superior court. July 19, 1909. B. E. Thrasher, F. O. Foster, Brown <£ Randolph, and R. S. Parker, for plaintiff in error. Gobb & Erwin, George G. Thomas, and W. M. Smith, contra.
2. The action was for damages…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Savannah Electric Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Savannah Electric Co. v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Savannah Electric Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
3Cited by13 opinions
- Howard v. Georgia Railway & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Savannah Electric Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Colt Co. v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.