Legal Opinion

Lane v. Au Sable Electric Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1914No. Docket No. 84PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Muskegon; Sullivan, J. Case by William Lane against the Au Sable Electric Company for an unlawful eviction. Judgment for plaintiff on a directed verdict for less than the damages claimed, and he brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This suit is brought by William Lane to recover damages which he alleges he sustained by reason of an unlawful eviction of himself and family from ■certain premises located in the city of Muskegon Heights, owned by defendant.

The plaintiff was chief operator of the substation ■of the defendant at Muskegon Heights, when a strike ■came on. His testimony as to the occurrences which .gave rise to this litigation is, in substance, as follows:

“I lived there and operated the station, used the house as a dwelling house. The time of this strike was the 27th day of May, 7 o’clock in the evening. I don’t…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trustees of East Norway Lake Norwegian Evangelical Lutheran Church v. FroislieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. Bowman v. BradleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  3. Heffelfinger v. FultonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tipsword v. PotterIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  2. De Bruyn Produce Co. v. RomeroMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Angel v. Black Band Consolidated Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Graniteville Manufacturing Co. v. RenewSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  5. Davis v. LongNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API