Legal Opinion

Dorchester Hugoton, Ltd. v. Dorchester Master Ltd. Partnership

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 30, 1996No. 83,475PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSEN, Presiding Judge:

Appellants, Dorchester Master Limited Partnership (“DMLP”), Parker & Parsley Gas Processing Co. and Parker & Parsley Development Co. (collectively “P & P”), and Midland Gas Processing Co. (“Midland”), seek review of the trial court’s order which denied their application for a temporary injunction against Appellee Dorchester Hugo-ton, Ltd. (“Dorchester”). Appellants sought a temporary injunction against Dorchester, to enjoin Dorchester from interfering with Appellants’ rights to process the gas pro duced from Dorchester’s wells and from interfering with its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Schulte v. Hallco Environmental, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. First American Bank & Trust Co. v. SawyerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Roye Realty & Developing, Inc. v. WatsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tulsa Order of Police Lodge No. 93 v. City of TulsaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
  2. Thayne A. Hedges Regional Speech & Hearing Center, Inc. v. BaughmanCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API