The Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Marlboro Cotton Mills
District Court, E.D. South Carolina
In Equity. Sait by the Firestone Tire & Rubber Company and another against the Marlboro Cotton Mills to restrain the enforcement of a default judgment. On complainants5 motion for temporary injunction and defendant’s motion to dismiss the bill.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, District Judge.
This matter comes up upon an application for a. temporary injunction. Due notice of the application was given and counsel for all parties interested have appeared and fded their returns and affidavits, and the motion has been heard upon the pleadings and affidavits in the cause. At the same time was heard a motion by counsel for the defense to dismiss the complainants’ bill of complaint. Counsel for all parties interested have been fully heard.
According to the bill of complaint, the complainants are two separate corporations, both having practically the same name. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Simon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Mutual Reserve Fund Life Assn. v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Phelps v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
- Jenkins v. Penn Bridge Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
- McNeill v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Atlantic Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. MetzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Mas v. Orange-Crush Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- AG-CHEM. EQUIP. CO., INC. v. DaggerhartCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984