Legal Opinion
In re Lane
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 30, 2018No. 18-8005PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT W. DALES, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judge.
The appellants in this case, Sarah and Kevin Dean (the "Deans" or the "Appellants"), are pro se creditors who moved to dismiss the chapter 13 case of Linda Lane ("Ms. Lane" or the "Debtor") shortly after the Bankruptcy Court confirmed the Debtor's Plan. The court denied their motion to dismiss the case on February 5, 2018, after finding that the Deans' arguments should have been made prior to confirmation and were precluded by the confirmation order. The Deans now appeal from the order denying their post-confirmation motion to dismiss.
In…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dean v. Lane (In re Lane)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- CG Acquisitions, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
- In re SmithBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Lapeer Aviation, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022