Smith v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1DissentPetty, J.
Despite the majority’s attempt to redefine the question before us, the issue is really quite simple: is a failure to make an indispensable transcript part of the record a jurisdictional defect that requires dismissal of the appeal? Over a quarter of a century ago, our Supreme Court answered that question with clear, unambiguous, and unequivocal language. The Court said,
[W]e must dismiss the writ as improvidently awarded. We take the occasion ... to reiterate the jurisdictional nature *364of [former] Rule 5:9 and to reemphasize the necessity of compliance with its mandatory requirements.
* * * % * *
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Porter v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
- Jay v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
- Turner v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986
- Singh v. MooneySupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
- Davis v. MullinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.