Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided June 15, 2010No. 0422091Published

1DissentPetty, J.

Despite the majority’s attempt to redefine the question before us, the issue is really quite simple: is a failure to make an indispensable transcript part of the record a jurisdictional defect that requires dismissal of the appeal? Over a quarter of a century ago, our Supreme Court answered that question with clear, unambiguous, and unequivocal language. The Court said,

[W]e must dismiss the writ as improvidently awarded. We take the occasion ... to reiterate the jurisdictional nature *364of [former] Rule 5:9 and to reemphasize the necessity of compliance with its mandatory requirements.

* * * % * *

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Porter v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  2. Jay v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  3. Turner v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986
  4. Singh v. MooneySupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  5. Davis v. MullinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API