Legal Opinion

United States v. George N. Muzevsky

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 17, 1985No. 84-5101PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

George N. Muzevsky was convicted of conspiracy and related narcotics offenses in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), and 18 U.S.C. § 1952. On appeal, he argues that his conviction should be reversed because the trial was conducted in his absence. We affirm.

Muzevsky appeared at the arraignment with counsel and entered a plea of not guilty. The court told him the trial date and continued his bond. A few days before the trial, his attorney explained to Muzevsky that he had to be present at the trial and that the court might proceed in his absence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. United States v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. Hoyt PowellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. Norman D. Wright, United States of America v. George W. Kirby, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Frederick Charles Latham, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Alejandro Camacho, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. SullensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. State v. HudsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API