Legal Opinion

Schroeder v. Rouse (In Re Redding)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 25, 2001No. 00-6092 WMPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, Bankruptcy Judge.

I

The attorney for the debtors appeals an order directing him to disgorge $10,011.40 of the $11011.40 fees he received for his costs and services in the bankruptcy case. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the order of the bankruptcy court. 2

The debtors filed a chapter 13 petition to prevent a state court foreclosure of their real property. At that time, Schroeder, as counsel for the debtors, filed a statement under Rule 2016(b) disclosing that the debtors paid him $3,000 for services relating to the chapter 13 case, but did not as required by Local Rule 2016-1,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re Jonathan Barnes Leavitt, Debtor. Jonathan Barnes Leavitt v. Carlos SotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. In Re: Daniel Fordu, Debtor. Harold A. Corzin v. Julie A. ForduCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. In Re DownsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. In Re: Clara ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  5. In Re Frank Pio Crivello, Debtor. Kravit, Gass & Weber, S.C. v. M. Scott Michel, United States TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re BrentUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  2. In Re MayeauxUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas · 2001
  3. In Re JacksonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  4. In Re Dental Profile, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  5. Se Prop. Holdings, LLC v. Stewart (In re Stewart)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API