Se Prop. Holdings, LLC v. Stewart (In re Stewart)
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MARKER, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. Introduction
Attorney Ruston Welch failed to disclose the compensation he received from *428David and Terry Stewart (the "Debtors") and their related entities, as required by 11 U.S.C. § 329(a) and Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2016(b).2 Upon discovering the omission, one of the Debtors' creditors sought to have Mr. Welch's compensation disgorged. After a hearing, the bankruptcy court ordered Mr. Welch to pay a sanction of $ 25,000 to the Debtors' estate, rather than disgorging the almost $ 350,000 of total compensation. The creditor moved to alter or amend the…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- David A Stewart and Terry P StewartUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2021
- David A Stewart and Terry P StewartUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2021
- David A Stewart and Terry P StewartUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2025
- Estate of Arlene TownsendDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
- Estate of Arlene Townsend v. Shumaker Loop & Kendrick, LLPDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.