Legal Opinion

Clark v. Handleman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 1, 1947Published

1Opinion of the CourtDolan, J.

This is an action of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff as a result of the alleged negligence of the defendants. At the close of the evidence the defendants filed a motion for a directed verdict. The motion was denied by the judge, and the defendants excepted to that action. The jury returned *517a verdict for the plaintiff and the judge reserved leave to enter a verdict for the defendants. Thereafter he denied the defendants’ motion that he so do, subject to the defendants’ exception.

The jury would have been warranted in finding the following facts: On…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sneckner v. FeingoldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Ware v. Evangelical Baptist Benevolent & Missionary SocietyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  3. Sterns v. Highland Hotel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. McDermott v. Merchants Cooperative BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API