Legal Opinion

Young v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 11, 2025No. 25-1150Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 25-1150 Filed: December 11, 2025 HOWARD YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Howard Young, San Jose, CA, Pro Se Plaintiff. Daniel A. Hoffman, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, with Eric P. Burskin, Assistant Director, Patricia M. McCarthy, Director, and Brian M. Boynton, Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., and Robert R. Rodriguez, MAJ, JA, Litigation Attorney, Military Personnel Branch, Litigation Division, Fort Belvoir, VA, Of Counsel, for Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API