Legal Opinion

State v. O'BRIEN

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 2, 1994No. 93-1841, 93-1842PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

633 So.2d 96 (1994)

STATE of Florida, Petitioner,

v.

Thomas O'BRIEN, Respondent.

STATE of Florida, Petitioner,

v.

Thomas O'BRIEN, Respondent.

Nos. 93-1841, 93-1842.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

March 2, 1994.

Norman R. Wolfinger, State Atty., and Benjamin B. Garagozlo, Asst. State Atty., Melbourne, for petitioner.

Douglas D. Marks of Potter, McClelland, Marks & Healy, P.A., Melbourne, for respondent.

EN BANC

HARRIS, Chief Judge.

We have elected to hear these cases en banc.

The State seeks certiorari review of in limine orders of the lower court denying the State the right to present…

Also in this document: Dissent · Griffin; Concurrence · Diamantis; Dissent · Griffin; Concurrence · Sharp.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Pardo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. Heuring v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  4. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
  5. Talley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Audano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. State v. RawlsSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  3. Petersen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API