Legal Opinion
City of Los Angeles v. Venice Peninsula Properties
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 22, 1988No. B034790PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COMPTON, J.
On March 25, 1981, we filed an opinion in this case which directed reversal of a judgment of the trial court which had been entered in favor of the State of California (State) and its successor in interest, City of Los Angeles (City).
The thrust of the claim of the State and City and the judgment entered on that claim by the trial court was that a public trust easement existed on certain privately held property in what is known as the Ballona Lagoon.
Subsequently, the California Supreme Court granted hearing and rendered an opinion upholding the judgment of the trial court.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Knight v. United States Land Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Borax Consolidated, Ltd. v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- County of Lake v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Friends of Martin's Beach v. Martin's Beach 1California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Friends of Martin's Beach v. Martin's Beach 1 LLC, California Court of Appeal, 1st District2016