Legal Opinion
Gattegno v. Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLP
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 6, 2001No. Civ. No. 3:00CV1399 (JCH)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CORRECTED1 RULING
FITZSIMMONS, United States Magistrate Judge.
The issue before the court is whether plaintiff should be compelled to disclose her and her husband’s joint tax returns pursuant to a discovery request from defendant. The issue is before the court by way of defen*71dant’s motion to compel [doc. # 25].2 Plaintiff has submitted the tax returns to the court for an in camera inspection “to determine whether they should be produced to Defendant or subject to a protective order ...” [See Letter from Attorney Dickinson to the court, dated June 27, 2001, at p. 1.3] For the reasons discussed…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Noffke v. PerezAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Aliotti v. Vessel SenoraDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
- Weststeyn Dairy 2 v. Eades Commodities Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2003
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ceridian Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.