Legal Opinion

Borg-Warner Corp. v. Goodwin

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 20, 1945No. 3651PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LEDERLE, District Judge.

Findings of Fact

I. This action arises under the Patent Laws of the United States. Plaintiff Borg-Warner Corporation is an Illinois corporation. Plaintiff David E. Gamble is a citizen of Illinois. Defendants George I. Goodwin and John F. Daukus are citizens of Michigan and reside in this District.

2. David E. Gamble filed a patent application on a clutch plate, Serial No. 147,936, in the United States Patent Office on June 12, 1937, and assigned it to Borg-Warner Corporation.

3. John F. Daukus filed patent application on a dutch plate, Serial No. 226,924, in the United…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Altvater v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. E. Edelmann & Co. v. Triple-A Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rendleman v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API