Legal Opinion

Holder v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 26, 2016No. 16-2207PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

2Per curiam

Norris G. Holder’s motion for authorization to file a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 based on Johnson v. United States, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015), and Welch v. United States, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 1257, 194 L.Ed.2d 387 (2016), has been considered by the court and is denied, because bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (e) is a “crime of violence” under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A). See United States v. Boman, 810 F.3d 534, 543 (8th Cir. 2016) (holding that the crime of federal robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2111, which must be committed…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. United States v. James McNealCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  4. In re HinesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Donald BomanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Jamaal EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Michael St. HubertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  3. Sahlin v. USADistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API