Legal Opinion

Tice v. Southington Board of Education

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided May 5, 2000No. 3:96CV1651 (JBA)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW [DOC. #95]

ARTERTON, District Judge.

After trial, in which a jury awarded the plaintiff $60,000 against defendant South-ington Board of Education (“Board”) on a claim of negligent infliction of emotional distress, the defendant moved for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 50. The defendant argues that the Board is shielded from liability by the doctrine of governmental immunity.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Since 1977, plaintiff Charlene Tice has been employed as a teacher by the defendant Southington Board of Education…

2Cases cited28 opinions

Gordon v. Bridgeport Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
Cruz v. Local Union No. 3 of International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
Parsons v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
Mary Ann Luciano v. The Olsten Corporation Frank N. Liguori Gordon J. Bingham Martin GelermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
Blissett v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Miner v. Town of CheshireDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
Condon v. Town of BrookfieldDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024