Legal Opinion
DeLoach v. Georgia Coast & Piedmont Railroad
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 17, 1912PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Action for damages. Before Judge Rawlings. Tattnall superior court. October 5, 1910.
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
1. An amendment offered but disallowed by the court is no part oí the record, and consequently can not be considered by the Supreme Court unless it be set out in the bill of exceptions or annexed thereto as an exhibit and duly authenticated. Moore v. Guyton, 110 Ga. 330 (35 S. E. 339).
2. The petition contained, among others, the following allegations: The plaintiffs owned a tract of land containing eight acres, more or less, in a named city, bounded on the north, south, and west by the lines of a certain named person, and on the east by the right of way of the defendant railroad company. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hawkins v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Southern Railway Co. v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Athens Terminal Co. v. Athens Foundry & Machine WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Moore v. Town of GuytonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
3Cited by3 opinions
- DeLoach v. Georgia Coast & Piedmont RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Georgia Power Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Trammell v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936