Legal Opinion

Moore v. Town of Guyton

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 3, 1900PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Equitable petition. Before Judge Seabrook. Effingham superior court. May term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtFish, J.

1. An amendment offered to a petition but disallowed by the court is no part of the record, and consequently can not be considered by the Supreme Court unless it be set out in the bill of exceptions or annexed thereto as an exhibit and duly authenticated. Sibley v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association, 87 Ga. 738; Barnett v. Railway Co., Id. 767; Boone v. Jackson, 98 Ga. 490.

2. There was no error in dismissing on demurrer an equitable petition brought solely for the purpose of enjoining the mayor, aldermen, and treasurer of a town from collecting a sum of money due to it from the county…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sibley v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  2. Boon v. Mayor of JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sayer v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Chadwick v. DolinoffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  3. Ponder v. GinnerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Johnson v. GilmerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  5. Hays v. ClaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API