Legal Opinion

Rose Finsky, 1 v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp., a New York Corporation, Owners and Operators of a Division Thereof Known as Haynes Stellite Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 26, 1957No. 12053_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment in favor of defendant, entered on defendant’s motion, which judgment also denied plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.

Plaintiffs filed a complaint in what they state is an action for damages for breach of a contract of sale, involving certain tungsten powder 2 and other materials.

Defendant’s answer to the complaint, as later amended, 3 set up, among affirmative defenses, that title to the tungsten was in the federal government, and any prospective sale of the said tungsten was subject to the applicable United States…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  2. Oscar Socop-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Murphy v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  4. Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor v. Gilles & Cotting, Inc., and Occupational Safety and Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
  5. Harold Wilson v. Michael O'leary, Warden, Stateville Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API