Legal Opinion

Craviolini v. Scholer & Fuller Associated Architects

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1966No. 8046-PRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

Pursuant to Rule 47(b), 17 A.R.S., Rules . of Supreme . Court, appellants, plaintiffs herein, petitioned this Gourt to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in the case of Craviolini v. Scholer & Fuller Associated Architects, 2 Ariz.App. 412, 409 P.2d 571, which affirmed the -judgment of the trial court. This appeal is another phase of a matter that ,has heretofore been before this . Court: Craviolini v. Scholer & Fuller Associated Architects, 89 Ariz. 24, 357 P.2d . 611.

This is an appeal from a tort action for intentional interference with a construction contract.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jacob v. MinerArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Craviolini v. Scholer & Fuller Associated ArchitectsArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Jacobson v. Laurel Canyon Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Roosevelt Irrigation DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Calumet v. GardnerArizona Supreme Court · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shell Oil Co. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  2. Fousel v. Ted Walker Mobile Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  3. Banner Realty, Inc. v. TurekArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Continental National Bank v. EvansArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Downs v. ShouseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API