American Express Co. v. State Nat. Bank
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County■; Geo. W. Clark, Judge'.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This was an action commenced by the- defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below, to recover back the sum of $85.2.55 paid by said bank to the express company on a forged check. Upon trial to a 'jury, there was a verdict for the plaintiff, upon which judgment was duly entered, to reverse which this proceeding in error was commenced.
The facts upon which the main proposition of law presented by counsel is based are undisputed, and are substantially as follows: On the 24th day of August, 1904, Weaver & Seaver were subagents of the American Express Company…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- First National Bank of Danvers v. First National Bank of SalemMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- First National Bank v. RickerIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- First National Bank v. State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
- Canadian Bank of Commerce v. BinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- First National Bank v. Bank of WyndmereNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- First Nat. Bank v. United States Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- First National Bank v. Bank of Cottage GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1911
- Cherokee Nat. Bank v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- American Surety Co. v. Industrial Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- First State Bank & Trust Co. v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.