Legal Opinion

Callophone Co. v. A. Jaeckel & Co.

New York City Court

Decided July 3, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSulzberger, J.

This is a controversy submitted upon an agreed statement of facts pursuant to section 124 of the Municipal Court Code. On October 6, 1927, plaintiff and defendant signed an instrument in writing by the terms of which plaintiff undertook to furnish, install, and maintain certain callophone equipment and incidental wiring in defendant’s place of business. Plaintiff agreed to repair the equipment and wiring at its own cost upon receiving notice of the necessity thereof from defendant. Plaintiff also agreed, upon notice, to change the location of any or all of the equipment and wiring within the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Allegheny College v. National Chautauqua County Bank of JamestownNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Moran v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Chicago & Great Eastern Railway Co. v. DaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  4. Justice v. . LangNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  5. Butler v. ThomsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of MontgomeryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  2. Sanford v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API