Legal Opinion

Jew Yet Wing v. Tillinghast

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 3, 1930No. 4169PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MORTON, District Judge.

The discrepancies are slight and of themselves do not, as the immigration authorities practically agree, warrant a rejection of the applicant’s claim as fabricated and fraudulent. There is another aspect of the ease, however, which in connection with the discrepaneies.led the immigration tribunals to their conclusion. The boy and his father testified that he was horn in January, 1918, and was not quite 12 years old when he applied for admission. Dr. Nute, of the United States Health Service, examined him and gave his opinion that the hoy could not be less than 13 years…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wong Fook Ngoey v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chin Thick Ming v. WardDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API