Legal Opinion

Comenos v. Viacom International, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 6, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-72231PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GADOLA, District Judge.

On April 28, 1994, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment and plaintiff filed a partial motion for summary judgment. On May 9, 1994, plaintiff filed a response to defendant’s motion. Defendant responded to plaintiffs motion May 12, 1994. Plaintiff filed a reply brief May 17, 1994. Defendant filed a reply brief May 16,1994. Pursuant to LR 7.1(e)(2) (Jan. 1, 1992, E.D.Mich.), the court determined that no oral argument was necessary. Discovery closed in…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Iverson Industries, Inc. v. Metal Management Ohio, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
  2. Cloverdale Equipment Co. v. Manitowoc Engineering Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
  3. Comenos v. Viacom International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API