Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Cabell

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1900No. 3,140PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Lawrence Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.

Appellees brought this action against the appellants, who were defendants below, to replevin a stock of groceries. Possession was claimed by virtue of a chattel mortgage alleged to have been executed by the appellant Susan F. McKinney, the then owner, to appellees. Appellants Herod B. Flora, Otto 0., and Alice McKinney, were in possession, and claimed to be the owners at the commencement of this suit by purchase, without notice, of appellant, the mortgagor, their mother. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of appellees for the possession- of the goods.

*677Appellant Susan E.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ross v. MenefeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Pereau v. FrederickNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Hollingsworth v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  4. Koehring v. Aultman, Miller & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Kime v. JesseNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cabell v. McKinneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Basey v. McKinneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Basey v. McKinneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API