Legal Opinion

Koehring v. Aultman, Miller & Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1893No. 759PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, C. J.

The appellee, a foreign corporation, instituted this action for the recovery of the value of certain personal property upon which, it was alleged in the complaint, the appellee held a chattel mortgage, but which was converted by the appellants to their own use, and placed beyond the appellee’s reach.

In the trial court, the appellee recovered judgment for $70, the appellants having previously offered to allow judgment for $50.

The first ruling complained of is the refusal of the *477trial court to strike out certain portions of the complaint.

Such a ruling does not constitute reversible error. Lewis…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Morris v. SternIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. KinseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Muncie National Bank v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Ross v. MenefeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Duke v. StricklandIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. RansfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Reinstein v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Baldwin v. BoyceIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Aetna Insurance v. StroutIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Stewart v. LongIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API